Plus: Abortion care resumes in Wisconsin

Here’s another edition of Hard to Believe It’s Only Tuesday, a weekly roundup of the top headlines, tweets (for now!), toks, takes, and more in abortion news. You can always email me (andrea.grimes@gmail.com) or DM me on instagram with action items, takes, and news clips. This post is probably too long for email, so click on the links up there ^ above the headline to open in your browser. You don’t want to miss this week’s Good Night and Good Dunk!

Photo via Elvert Barnes/Flickr/Creative Commons

PROGRAMMING NOTE: I’m looking for new photos to illustrate this newsletter, as the font of Creative Commons options on Flickr is not endlessly self-renewing. Have you taken photos at a public pro-abortion protest or other fun feminist event that you’d be willing to let me publish? I’ll credit folks, of course, and am happy to make a small donation to a cause of the photographer’s choosing if I end up using a pic. So! Send photos my way — andrea dot grimes at gmail com — or tag me wherever your images already exist online, assuming it’s clear you have ownership/permission to share.

The big takeaway: The ultimate goal of the anti-abortion movement is to ban all abortion and criminalize people who have abortions, people who provide abortions, and people who support abortions. No matter what Nikki Haley or some other dippy Republican trying to be president says at a brain-numbing debate about 15-week bans or so-called “compromise,” the upshot is and will be to ban and criminalize abortion because the that is what the people driving anti-abortion policy and legal efforts — and funding political campaigns — want!

The Top Headlines

The Takes


The Tweets/Toks/Grams

  • YUP:
  • Last week was the anniversary of the Hyde Amendment. Here’s Sister Song:


The Fuck Are We Supposed to Do About It?


Goodnight and good dunkThe Sweet Feminist Becca Rea-Tucker is all “but nothing” on the “I’m pro-choice, but …” rhetoric and I for one am all about it. She writes: “We do not need to know what you think you would/wouldn’t do in a particular situation, or your opinion about what someone else has done. It is irrelevant. Our job is to show up for people who have abortions with love and unconditional support. We can lead by example through unwavering respect and compassion for people who have abortions.”


That’s all for this week. I’m sure I’ve missed something you’d like to see featured in this roundup, for I am but one woman with a computer and an abortion-news-induced drinking problem. Holler at me — andrea.grimes@gmail.com, or DM me on Instagram, and I’ll try to add follow-ups as I’m able.

5 responses to “Texas Anti-Abortion Lawyer Demands Names of Abortion Funders for ‘Hit List’”

  1. Has Jonathan Mitchell not heard of HIPAA? How can a court force anyone to give up that information?????

    Liked by 1 person

    1. If I understand the law correctly, HIPAA merely protects patients from having their medical information shared by a provider illegally/without a court order. Abortion funds and funders/clients don’t have a HIPAA-type relationship.

      Like

  2. Susan McPherson Avatar
    Susan McPherson

    Thank you for this valuable resource. So grateful. When time permits do check out DontBanEquality.com – a coalition of nearly 1,000 businesses making the clear case that public policies that restrict reproductive health care are bad for business. Access to reproductive healthcare is a core business issue!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. One quick observation: I’m 70, old enough to remember pre-Roe while a sexually active teen. I had a roommate whose wealthy older boyfriend flew her from Pittsburgh to NYC where to get a legal abortion. The following year a group of us got a van to take another roommate to D.C. for the same reason. The anti-abortion states had laws that were bad enough back then, but none were anywhere close to the sadistic, 1984-ish ones being passed constantly today. It’s as if someone decided to bring back witch-burning in 2023 but believed a slow death by fire just wasn’t harsh enough to stop people from casting spells.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Well put re: witch-burning. Ugh.

      Like

Leave a reply to Andrea Grimes Cancel reply

Recent Posts