The question of if, when, how, and to what extent states can ban emergency abortion care — and allow for the prosecution of doctors who provide “stabilizing” abortions to patients — is headed to the Supreme Court.

A George W. Bush appointee and two Trump appointees on the Fifth Circuit ruled that Texas’ abortion bans supersede federal laws that allow doctors to provide life-saving abortions to pregnant people.

Days after the Supreme Court announced it will consolidate and hear oral arguments in two cases related to medication abortion access, the New York Times dropped a Sunday blockbuster looking at what basically amounts to the story of Sam Alito’s enthusiastic dismantling of whatever ethical credibility the court had left in the pursuit of overturning…

Two women’s experiences in Ohio and Texas expose the deep cruelties — in many ways deliberately engineered cruelties — baked into abortion bans and the treatment and criminalization of pregnancy loss in the United States, especially post-Dobbs.

The state of Texas says it doesn’t have a responsibility to clarify statutory language that could save pregnant people’s lives.

This week, the Texas Supreme Court will hear AG Ken Paxton’s best argument for forcing pregnant people with life-threatening pregnancies to die at the hands of the state.

It’s probably a total coincidence that Ohio’s anti-abortion Republican Secretary of State, Frank LaRose, purged 26,000 voters from the rolls just in time for Ohioans to head to the polls tomorrow to vote on the Issue 1 constitutional amendment on abortion rights. Surely could not be part of the mass, desperate panic to silence Buckeye…